Retail chains are using the fine print in their leases to demand rent reductions, eking out critical savings and pressuring mall owners already struggling with vacancies….
…. Retailers that want to stay put are using the triggered clauses to negotiate multi-year rent reductions from their landlords, often in exchange for adding more years to their leases. Some cotenancy clauses allow retailers to pay lower rent if a mall or shopping center’s occupancy falls below a certain threshold.
Rent is among the biggest expenses for retailers. As sales continue to drop, the fixed cost of rent eats away at already thin profit margins. The average specialty retailer spent roughly 12% of sales on rent last year, up a percentage point from 2007. Citigroup estimates that the figure could reach 13% this year.
Reflecting a decline in revenue, Chico’s rent as a percentage of sales reached 10% in 2008, up from 7% two years earlier.
For commercial landlords, the cotenancy demands are one part of a miserable picture as they suffer through the current recession.
According to data released Wednesday by real-estate research company Reis Inc., the average lease rate at shopping centers — defined as open-air centers and big-box centers as opposed to enclosed malls — in the top 77 U.S. markets declined in the second quarter for the fifth consecutive quarter. In the 29 years it has tracked the figures, Reis says it has never seen a stretch of declines that long. At enclosed malls, average lease rates declined for the third consecutive quarter. Store vacancies are also hitting multiyear highs.
With a recent boom in the construction of open-air shopping centers — which depend on chains of smaller shops rather than department stores — many retailers insisted on adding clauses requiring that other key specialty retailers be signed as tenants, to ensure ample drawing power. As chains now either shutter stores or curtail expansions, use of the clauses is on the rise.
“We all sort of locked arms and said, ‘Let’s jump in the pool together,’” says David Zoba, senior vice president of real estate for Gap. “Now some of us are getting out of the water.”
The result is a ripple effect, as failures trigger cotenancy violations, which in turn lead to canceled leases, more vacancies and more violations.
Bankruptcies have led to many of vacancies. Last year, at least 27 major retailers filed for bankruptcy protection, followed by another 13 so far this year, according to BankruptcyData.com. Many of these companies, including Linens ‘n Things Inc., Mervyns LLC, Circuit City and Sharper Image Corp., eventually opted to liquidate, leaving vacant stores.
That can trigger cotenancy benefits for other retailers, says Matthew Bordwin, managing director at KPMG Corporate Finance LLC, which represents retailers looking to restructure their leases.
Courtesy: Wall Street Journal, Thursday, July 9, 2009
Leave a Reply